Kendal Power Station Print E-mail
 

Battery Equaliser test.                   KENDAL POWER STATION      19/06/01

 

Unit 1. P.A. System.

 

Battery Type:                                                          YHP 21. 1200 A/Hr 26 Volt Bank.

Charger Type:                                                         ‘Static Power’ 30Volt 150 A/hr.

 

Purpose of Test:

  • To establish the power consumed from the AC power supply to maintain the battery in a similar state of charge without and with the addition of the Battery Equaliser formula.
  • Secondary test, to establish any battery performance improvement with the use of the additive.

Step One.

Record the charger readings.

Using a ‘Fluke’ 36 Tong Tester, the AC ampere current was measured on each of the 3 phase wires leading to the ammeter.

First phase:               1.3 AC Amps.

Second phase:         1.0 AC Amps.

Third phase:             1.2 AC Amps.

Float charge: 9 Amps DC output. 30 Volts.

Step Two.

The charger was deactivated at exactly 11.00 Am.

The cells were allowed a 20 minute settling period before readings were taken.


Step Three.

In order to prevent damage to the battery plates, it was established by Battery Equaliser International, that a load of 100 Amps for a period of 5 hours be drawn from the battery to establish a base line test. This would allow the battery to be placed back into immediate service without causing any complication to the stations emergency requirements.

Although there was a large amount of scale present within the cells, there appeared to be no evidence of positive plate growth or ‘buckling’ of the plates.

BASE TEST.

No Load

 

Load

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

 
   

Volts

25.88

           

28.04

 

Time

11.45

12.45

13.45

14.45

15.45

16.45

 
     

Immediate load

1st

hour

2nd

hour

3rd

hour

4th

hour

5th

 

Volts

S.G.

Cell

volt

volt

volt

volt

volt

Volt

S.G.

2.142

1190

1

1.967

1.978

1.976

1.972

1.967

1.961

1160

2.140

1185

2

1.964

1.976

1.974

1.971

1.966

1.961

1160

2.162

1220

3

1.994

2.010

2.008

2.004

1.999

1.993

1200

2.141

1190

4

1.964

1.976

1.974

1.971

1.966

1.960

1160

2.157

1220

5

1.986

2.004

2.002

1.998

1.993

1.987

1190

2.151

1200

6

1.978

1.993

1.991

1.987

1.983

1.977

1180

2.172

1240

7

2.001

2.020

2.017

2.012

2.007

2.001

1200

2.145

1200

8

1.967

1.984

1.982

1.978

1.973

1.968

1170

2.145

1200

9

1.973

1.984

1.982

1.978

1.973

1.968

1170

2.137

1200

10

1.961

1.982

1.980

1.976

1.972

1.966

1160

2.142

1200

11

1.968

1.985

1.983

1.979

1.974

1.969

1160

2.142

1200

12

1.971

1.991

1.989

1.984

1.980

1.973

1170

2.144

1200

13

1.965

1.983

1.981

1.977

1.973

1.968

1170

Average

                 

2.148

1203

 

1.948

1.990

1.988

1.984

1.979

1.973

1173

CONCLUSION

The initial individual cell voltage was low, but acceptable. The initial specific gravity readings were indicative of an undercharged battery.

The unit if float charged at approximately 0.5% of its capacity, which on initial inspection, does assist with voltage. This however, did drop several points rapidly

When placed on a 100 Ampere open circuit load.


Step 4.

The cells were treated with the Battery Equaliser Fluid.

Step 5.

The battery was placed on charge at 17.30 hrs. The initial charging amps climbed to 150 Ampere per hour. The charge had tapered down to 7 Amps at 8.00 hrs the next day.

Step 6.

At exactly 9.30 hours, Wednesday the 20th of June, 01, the charger ammeter wires were checked for AC current draw.

The results were:

First phase:               1.4 AC Amps.

Second phase:         1.0 AC Amps.

Third phase:             1.2 AC Amps.

Float charge: 7 Amps DC output. 30 Volts.


Step 7.

The charger was deactivated at exactly 9.55 AM.

The cells were again allowed a 20 minute settling period before readings were taken.

No Load

 

Load

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

100

AMP

 
   

Volts

             

10.15

 

Time

10.20

11.20

12.20

13.20

     
     

Immediate load

1st

hour

2nd

hour

3rd

hour

4th

hour

5th

 

Volts

S.G.

Cell

volt

volt

volt

Volt

volt

Volt

S.G.

2.165

1170

1

2.014

1.990

1.983

1.973

   

1170

2.160

1170

2

2.010

1.989

1.982

1.972

   

1170

2.182

1210

3

2.035

2.025

2.017

2.006

   

1200

2.163

1170

4

2.004

1.992

1.985

1.975

   

1170

2.178

1170

5

2.025

2.019

2.012

2.000

   

1200

2.171

1220

6

2.014

2.006

1.999

1.988

   

1190

2.188

1180

7

2.034

2.035

2.027

2.015

   

1210

2.164

1180

8

2.002

1.998

1.991

1.980

   

1180

2.169

1180

9

2.002

2.003

1.996

1.985

   

1180

2.161

1180

10

2.002

1.994

1.987

1.977

   

1170

2.163

1180

11

1.994

1.997

1.990

1.980

   

1170

2.163

1180

12

1.998

2.005

1.998

1.987

   

1180

2.164

1180

13

1.990

1.996

1.990

1.980

   

1180

                   

2.168

1182

 

2.009

2.004

1.997

1.986

   

1182

No true conclusion can be drawn from the initial discharge test incorporating the Battery Equaliser additive at this time.

The interesting point is that, although it is clear from the Specific Gravity readings, that the battery is not yet fully charged, voltage readings on open circuit are notably higher than the initial discharge without the treatment.


Step 8.

Initial charge DC output was back up to 150 Amps/ 30 Volts at 14.00 hrs.

It remained there until approximately 16.30 hrs when it tapered down to 50 Amps. At 08.00 hrs, on the 21st of June, the charger was float charging at 7 Amps.

Step 9.

Standard float voltage will be checked again on Friday 22nd June to verify any increase thereof.

The next examination of results has been established for Wednesday 27th June.

Wednesday 27th June.

The battery charger was checked at approximately 10.30 hrs. The battery was on full voltage and the charger output requirement had dropped to 2.5 Amps.

From the previous month’s records and the initial ‘Base Line Test’ records, this reflects an enormous drop in charge requirement to approximately 20% of the power requirement to maintain charge levels. This is almost an 80% reduction in power draw.

Not only is the charge requirement affected by the addition of the Battery Equaliser product, the voltage retention under load, shows a clear improvement of the batteries overall condition.


Step 11.

The battery was allowed a 50 minute settling time to establish if the charging voltage would drop any further than that reflected in previous reports.

The results are as shown.

No

Load

S.G.

Load

100

Amp

100

Amp

100

Amp

100

Amp

100

Amp

100

Amp

 
   

Volts

27.83

           
   

Time

11.15

12.15

13.15

14.15

     
     

Immediate

load

1st

hour

2nd

hour

3rd

hour

     

Volts

S.G.

Cell

volt

volt

volt

Volt

   

S.G.

2.135

1200

1

2.091

1.990

1.983

1.975

   

1180

2.133

1190

2

2.080

1.985

1.977

1.968

   

1170

2.154

1220

3

2.098

2.019

2.010

2.002

   

1210

2.134

1190

4

2.069

1.987

1.980

1.972

   

1180

2.149

1220

5

2.080

2.014

2.005

1.996

   

1200

2.143

1210

6

2.070

2.001

1.994

1.986

   

1190

2.162

1240

7

2.082

2.029

2.021

2.012

   

1220

2.137

1200

8

2.046

1.994

1.985

1.977

   

1180

2.142

1200

9

2.046

1.998

1.990

1.982

   

1190

2.132

1190

10

2.022

1.990

1.982

1.974

   

1180

2.136

1200

11

2.023

1.992

1.985

1.978

   

1180

2.138

1200

12

2.017

1.997

1.990

1.982

   

1190

2.137

1200

13

2.012

1.991

1.984

1.977

   

1180

                   

2.140

1204

 

2.057

2.000

1.991

1.983

   

1188

                   
                   

As evident in the completed charts we may conclude the following:

1.    The power consumption to maintain float charge has been reduced by almost

Eighty percent.

2.    The cell voltage has improved overall.

3.    The initial load of 100 Ampere did not spike or drop the cell voltage as before.

It was also noted that during both charge & discharge cycles, that the cells had reduced in plate gassing quite substantially.

This battery bank & charger will continue to be observed and monitored for a further six months on a regular basis.

The engineers at Kendal Power Station keep accurate records of all of the batteries (8000+ cells) and the charging rates. Using the past twelve months as a base along with the initial check at the beginning of this test, we were able to establish that, in order to maintain the battery at the required voltage for emergency usage, a constant charge rate of 9-10 ampere was being fed into the battery.

After the addition of the product 'Battery Equaliser' into each of the cells, the required charging current to maintain the acceptable voltage was automatically reduced to 2.5 ampere. This reduction was not made by manual resetting of the charger, it was an automatic reaction.

Because the product was able to reduce the battery's resistance to charge, the charger was doing less work to generate 'acceptable voltage'. Thus the charger required less current from the power supply to obtain the same result.

UPDATE:  July 9th, 2001

Most recent investigation (this week) shows that the charger is still operating at 2.5 Amps.

Battery Equaliser International wishes to thank the following members of the Kendal Power Station ‘Power Electronics’ team for their assistance and cooperation throughout the initial test period.

Messieurs: Leon van der Merwe, Johan Havenga, Chris Ntuli and Rod Young.

< Prev